Traben-Trarbach..

Andis Kaulins LinkedIn 14x14
View my book - "riveting" - "rare"
View my co-authored dictionary
14x14 LawPundit RSS Feed
Add Me
lawyer blogs



Forbes Latest Video





Financial Markets




Live Visitors to LawPundit




Clipmarks

Lijit Law Search

LawPundit Widgetbox Widget



Good Reads


Widget_logo

Documents

Legal Resources

Legal Resources Online
(Journals, Reviews, Articles
Newsletters, Alerts, etc.)

(alphabetically)

ABA Net (Law Resources)
AGIP Bulletin (Intellectual Property)
Arnold & Porter (Consumer Products)
BAILII (British & Irish Law)
Baker & McKenzie (Tax)
Berkeley Technology Law Journal
Bird and Bird (Media)
Chilling Effects (IP, Free Speech)
Cleary Gottlieb (M&A)
Clifford Chance (European Union)
Cooley Godward (IPOs, Tech)
Computer Law Review & Tech. J.
Cornell Law LII
Covington (Life Sciences, IP)
Crave (gadget blog)
Cybertelecom News
Debevoise (Private Equity)
Docstoc.com (Professional Documents & Forms)
Duke Law & Technology Review
EFF Legal Guide for Bloggers
EPO (European Patent Office)
European Union EU Websites
euro|topics Press Review
Faegre & Benson (Legal Dev.)
FindLaw RSS Feeds
Finnegan Henderson (IP, Patents)
Fish & Richardson (Patents)
German American Law Journal
Gibson Dunn (Tech, Corporate)
Gleiss Lutz (Cross-border Comp.)
GPO
Harvard Law Review
Hogan & H. (Antitrust, Bio, Food)
Holmes Roberts & Owen (IP, IT)
Institute for Law & Politics
Intute (Global Legal Resources)
IPtegrity.com
Intellectual Property Watch
IP Law - Ivan Hoffman
ILLCD Internet Law Library
Internet Legal Research Weekly
J. of Inform., Law & Technology
Jureeka!
Keller & Heckman (Packaging)
Latham & Watkins (SmartCapital)
Latvia Legal Resources
Law Dictionary
Lawyers Weekly
Legal 500 (Law Firms)
Legal Week (legal news)
Library of Congress (Copyrights)
LLRX (legal research)
Mayer Brown (EU Competition)
Media Law (Media, UK)
Michigan Law Rev. 1st Impressions
Morrison & Foster Legal Updates
Nolo (laymen's law)
Norton Rose (Financial Services)
On Point - US Legal News by State
Paul Weiss (Tech, Telecoms, IP)
Perkins Coie Digestible Law Blog
OUT-LAW (Pinsent Masons) (Tech)
Preston Gates (Elect. Discovery)
PRWeb (Press Release Distribution)
QuickLinks (Information Society)
RefDesk (online reference sources)
Review of Intellectual Property Law
Richmond J. of Law & Technology
Ropes & Gray (Legal Updates)
SciTech Daily Review (Tech News)
Search Systems (Public Records)
Seyfarth Shaw (Employment, IP)
Sidley & Austin (Cyberlaw)
Simpson & Thacher (Corporate)
Shearman & Sterling (Cap. M., IP)
Skadden (Corporate Law)
Slashdot (News for Nerds)
Stanford Law Review
Stanford Technology Law Review
TechnoLawyer (Legal Technology)
The Complete Lawyer
ToolPat (Patent Searches)
UCLA Journal of Law & Technology
USLaw.com
Vault (Legal Careers)
Virginia J. of Law & Technology
Web J. of Current Legal Issues
WebProNews (eBusiness)
Weil Gotshal (Bankruptcy)
White & Case (Data Security)
WilmerHale (IP, Venture Capital)
Wilson Sonsoni (Technology)
Winston & Strawn (Advertising)
World Law (LOC Guide to Nations)
Yale Law Journal

LawPundit Archives

LawPundit
Posting Archives


September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009

General Blogs & Websites

General Blogroll
(alphabetically)

A Fistful of Euros (EU politics)
AdRants (marketing & advertising news)
All About Latvia
Arianna Huffington (US politics)
arstechnica (technology)
Atlantic Blog
Attentio Blog (marketing)
Belmont Club (US politics)
Brad DeLong (economics)
CentreRight (UK politics)
CircleID (Internet Infrastructure)
Classical Values (to end culture war)
ConSource
Crooked Timber (of humanity)
Crooks and Liars (Vlogfather)
Daily Brief (Conde Nast)
Davos Newbies
Digital Inspiration (tech à la carte)
Eric Goldstein's Clog (clogs)
Freakonomics (economics)
FactCheck.org
Future Blogger
FuturePundit
Future Scanner
Gaping Void (scribbles)
Google Blog (all about Google)
IP Address Locator
Lifehacker (how to tips)
Luxist (luxury)
Mandarin Design (web design)
Mashable (what's new on the net)
Modulator (with the Friday Ark)
Naked Translations
Net neutrality in Europe
normblog (Norman Geras)
OUT-LAW
Oxford University Press Blog
Research Buzz
Robert Paterson's Blog
Rough Type (net as medium)
Rearl Clear Politics
Science And Technology On The Hill
SCRIPTed
Searchblog (John Battelle)
Talking Points Memo (US politics)
The Caucus (NY Times)
The Corner (NRO)
The Distant Librarian (libraries)
The Open Road (open source)
Throwing Things (pop culture)
TierneyLab (testing science)
TigerHawk (politics)
TimesOnline Blog
Tiny Frog (religion)
Translation Tribulations
Watchblog (political 3)
Weblogg-ed (education)
Women's Work
YARGB
ZDNet blogs


LAW PUNDIT Friday, April 07, 2006 4/07/2006 02:37:00 PM [Home]

Document Assembly not Patentable in the UK - Three Cheers for the London High Court 

Update: We received a comment to the original posting below which in all fairness we are posting at the top here to draw an equitable balance for our commentary:

"Your readers may be interested to know that the software referred to in your article at http://www.lawpundit.com/blog/2006/04/document-assembly-not-patentable-in-uk.htm
is the software underlying the patent applicant's website at www.ukcorporator.co.uk."
__________

Three cheers for the London High Court, which, according to Out-Law.com, has denied a patent for document assembly.

As written by Out-Law News on April 5, 2006:

"UK patents, like European patents, are only supposed to be granted for inventions which are capable of industrial application, which are new and which involve an inventive step. Schemes for performing mental acts, carrying out business methods and computer programs "as such" are among the exclusions from the scope of patentability."

That paragraph should be sent to every judge and legislator in the United States so that they begin to appreciate what the difference is between a "real patent" and a "simple monopoly claim for an idea".

Accordingly, in the case under review, "a patent application for an automated method of acquiring the documents necessary to incorporate a company" was refused as not being patentable.

Mr Justice Mann explained the new procedure recently implemented in the UK for patent examination which ought to be to mandatory reading for the United States Patent and Trademark Office and its staff. As Out-Law.com news summarizes:

"Patents Office examiners now:
- "Identify what is the advance in the art that is said to be new and not obvious (and susceptible of industrial application)," and
- "Determine whether it is both new and not obvious (and susceptible of industrial application) under the description of an 'invention' in the sense of" the European Patent Convention, reflected in the UK by the Patents Act.
"

The critical test in the UK, according to Mr Justice Mann is found in this reasoning:

"The point of the invention is to arrive at the appropriate company with the appropriate incorporation documents on the basis of information supplied by the user. This act of applying the criteria to arrive at the correctly documented conclusion seems to me to be clearly a mental act. Without a computer a skilled individual would do the same thing in much the same way."

That last sentence should be the benchmark for initially determining whether something is patentable.

If a skilled individual would do the same thing in much the same way - and this is clear in such cases as Amazon's one-click buying, MercExhange and eBay (instant buying), Eolas and Microsoft (instant application embedding) and NTP and RIM (instant e-mail messaging) - cases where it is clear that patents have not been stolen but rather where "other" skilled individuals have done a particular thing in much the same way as the patent claimant claimed in his patent application, then it is clear that the patent application tries to patent "a mental act" or "an idea", which is not an "invention" and is therefore not patentable.

Neither an idea nor simply writing down that idea on a piece of paper or submitting that idea in a writing to the patent office should ever be regarded as an "invention".

An invention, in our view, is a SPECIFIC incorporation of an idea into a SPECIFIC demonstrable product, and it is that product which should be patentable, and that product only. Any individual with the same idea but incorporating that idea into a different demonstrable product is NOT infringing the patent of someone incorporating that same idea into another demonstrable product. For example, a particular kind of mouse trap can be patented, but not the mouse trap idea per se. Indeed, a mouse trap which works by enclosing the mouse should only be patentable for one specific way to do this and not for all means by which a mouse can be "caught" in an enclosure. Even the broad general idea of a "door closing" on the mouse should not be patentable since that is obvious. Something has to be "invented" which is not obvious.

Put a different way, patents should not keep others from developing new inventions to achieve a particular objective. If the patent does that kind of limitation, then the patent granted is too broad, and should be revoked. A good example here is the EOLAS case where only the specific implementation of the idea, demonstrable in a product (EOLAS has no such demonstrable product), of embedding an application instantly into browser could be patentable. What the USPTO has done is to grant a patent which prohibits anyone else from instant embedding of applications into browsers, and that is government absurdity and stupidity at the highest level.

Somehow, American jurisprudence does not seem to "get it" on this very important point and we do wonder what the reason for that is. Perhaps it is the "get quick rich" US mentality? Just getting rich by having a good idea? Should that be enough? We think not. Society prospers primarily through the implementation of good ideas and not by the good ideas per se. Hence, it is also the actual implementers who should be primarily rewarded through the patent system and definitely NOT the patent trolls. Good ideas are and should be a "dime" a dozen, also in the eyes of patent examiners.

In the instant case, the patent applicant should of course be able to retain his copyright in his particular software, so that no one can steal that particular work. Nevertheless, the idea that companies can be incorporated online (by whatever method of juggling documents) has nothing to do with being an "invention" and of course there will be many websites down the road who offer this service in many different ways, and that is as it should be.

The best implementation of the idea will win in the end, and this will not necessarily be the person trying to patent a monopoly on that idea now. Ideas are not inventions.








LawPundit Publications
Author
Stars Stones and Scholars
Stars Stones Scholars
Science Book Review
"a riveting account
on ancient civilizations"

Amazon.com
"rare ... distance and depth"

Co-author of the Langenscheidt - Routledge
German-English English-German
Dictionary of Business
Commerce and Finance

german english dictionary
now in its 3rd Edition

LawPundit Plaxo Profile


LawPundit MyBlogLog



Law Blogs - Blawgs
LawPundit Law Blogroll
(alphabetically)

ABA Blawg Directory
ABA President's Blog
Above the Law
AbsTracked
ACLU Blog of Rights
A Connecticut Law Blog
ACSBlog
Adam Smith, Esq.
Advocate's Studio
Al Nye the Lawyer Guy
Althouse
Anticipate This!
Antitrust Hotch Potch (.be)
Antitrust Law Blog
Anything Under the Sun Made by Man
Australian Trade Marks Law
B2fxxx
Bag and Baggage
Balkinization
Bank Law Blog (.uk)
Bank Lawyer's Blog
Bartlett Blawg
beck-blog Die Experten (.de)
Becker-Posner Blog
Bibliotheksrecht (.de)
Binary Law (.uk)
BizzBangBuzz
Blawg.com
BlawgIT
Blawgletter
Blawg Review
Blawg Search
Blog@IP::JUR
Buck Stops Here
Build a Solo Practice
Business Golf Blog
Business Opportunities Blog
Canadian Trademark Blog
Cearta (.ie)
Charon QC (.uk)
China Law Blog
China Business Law Blog
中國商法博客

Chinese Law Prof Blog
Class 46 (EU trade mark news)
CM Law Library Blog
Codigo-civil (.es)
cogito ergo teneo
Comparative Law Blog (.nl)
Concurring Opinions
Conflict of Laws (.uk)
Conglomerate
contentandcarrier (.eu)
CopyFight
Corporate Governance Blog
Counterfeit Chic (Copying)
Crim Law
Current Awareness (.uk)
Customs Law
Daily Kos
David Gulbransen
DC Dicta - Lawyers USA
Deal Attorney (M&A)
Deal Book
Delaware Bankruptcy Litigation
Delaware Law Office
Deliberations
Dennis Kennedy Blog
Discourse.net
Disputing
Doc Searls Weblog
Dorf on Law
Drug and Device Law Blog
e-comm (.de,.at)
E-Commerce Law
e-Justice Blog
E|Laws Tecnología y derecho (.ar)
ElbeBlawg (.de)
eLegal Canton (.ca)
Election Law
Embassy Law Blog
Empirical Legal Studies
Ernie the Attorney
EU Law Blog (.nl)
Faculty Blog Chicago
Feminist Law Professors
Filewrapper (IP Law)
Financial Industry Recovery Center
For the Defense (DRI)
Freedom to Differ (.au)
Freedom to Tinker
French-Law
George's Employment Blawg
GermanBlawgs
Grahnlaw
Groklaw
Guiding Rights Blog
Handakte (.de)
Head of Legal (.uk)
Health Blawg
Hollywood Entertainment & Media Law
Home Office Lawyer
Houston's Clear Thinkers
idealawg
Ideoblog
Immateriblog (.de)
Indefensible
India Patent Blog (.in)
Infamy or Praise
Informationoverlord (.uk)
InstaPundit
Inter Alia
International Trade Law News
Internet Cases
IP Dragon 知識產權龍
IP Faktor (.il)
iPhone J.D.
Info/Law of Information
In Their Opinion
International Economic Law & Policy
IP Estonia
IPKat
IP Law Poland
IP Think Tank
I/P Updates
IPwars (.au)
IT Law in Ireland
ITSSD - Journal on IP
Jiné právo (.cz)
Joe Gratz
Joshua Rozenberg on Law (.uk)
Journal du Marché Intérieur (.fr)
jurabilis (.de)
JuraBlogs (.de)
JuracityBlog (.de)
Jurakopf (.de)
Jurisdynamics
Just a Patent Examiner
Justice au singulier (.fr)
Justice Building Blog
Karel's Legal Blog (.an)
Landlord Law Blog (.uk)
Law and More
Law and Other Things (.in)
law blog (.de)
LawBeat
Lawclanger (.uk)
Lawdable
Law Department Management
Lawfinder blogs (.uk)
Law Firm Web Strategy
Lawinfo Weblog
LawLibTech
Law of War
Law Practice Tips Blog
Law Vibe
Law Weblog (.uk)
Law X.0
le Blog de Frédéric Rolin (.fr)
Legal Blog Watch
Legal Ethics Forum
Legal History Blog
Legal Jobs & Recruitment (.uk)
Legal Juice
Legal Pad (a Cal Law Blog)
Legal Pad (at Fortune Magazine)
Legal Sanity
Legal Talk Network
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Underground
Leiter Reports
Lessig Blog
Lex Ferenda (.ie)
LibraryLawBlog
Lightbulb (Dilanchian IP Blog) (.au)
Likelihood of Confusion
Lords of the Blog
Madisonian.net
Magistrate's Blog (.uk)
Maier & Maier (IP)
Marcel Berlins (.uk)
Marcel Leonardi (.br)
MassLawBlog
MauledAgain
Media Law Prof Blog
Mediation Channel
Mercolex (.pe)
Michael Geist (.ca)
MoneyLaw
Mortgage Fraud Blog
Naked Law (.uk)
Nearly Legal (.uk)
New Media & Technology Law Blog
Nolo's Bankruptcy & Foreclosure Blog
Nolo Intellectual Propery
Notas Terminologicas
Ohio Employer's Law Blog
Olivia Tambou (.fr)
Opinio Juris
Overseas Property Investment Blog
panGloss (.uk)
Paper Chase
Patent Baristas
Patent Docs
Patent Infringement Updates
Patently-O
Patterico's Pontifications
Peter Fleischer: Privacy...?
Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog
Philippine e-Legal Forum
Phosita
PLI Patent Blog
Prawfs Blawg
Precedent (Law & Style)
Privacy & Security Law
Professor Bainbridge
PubLawyer (.uk)
Quoi de neuf en Europe (.fr)
RSS Specifications
Rule of Law
SCOTUSblog
Seattle Trademark Lawyer
Securing Innovation
Settle It Now
Slaw (.ca)
Sound Evidence
Spicy IP (.in)
Sports Law Professor
Sports Economist
Sports Law Blog
Southern Appeal
Start Making Sense
Stock Broker Fraud Blog
Strategic Legal Technology
Supreme Dicta
SW Virginia law
TalkLeft
Tangible IP (.uk)
taxgirl
Tax Prof Blog
Techdirt
Tech Law Prof Blog
TechnoLlama (.uk)
Technology & Marketing
Telemedicus (.de)
The Common Scold
The Invent Blog
The Laboratorium
The Lawyer Coach Blog
The Legal Thing
the [non]billable hour
The Prior Art
The Settlement Channel
The Wired GC
Trademark Blog
TransBlawg (.uk)(.de)
TTABlog (Trademarks)
Unclaimed Territory
Useful Arts
Vertretbar Weblawg (.de)
Volokh Conspiracy
Washington Briefs
WisBlawg
Wise Law Blawg (.ca)
WSJ.com Law Blog
You And Yours Blawg
Zeugma

About the Author, Legal Notices, Our Websites, Blogs and Other Sites


LawPundit™ is a trademark name.
The LawPundit blog started October 1, 2003. This blog website is updated regularly.

The owner and webmaster of LawPundit.com is Andis Kaulins
B.A. University of Nebraska; J.D. Stanford University Law School
Former Lecturer in Anglo-American Law, FFA, Trier Law School
Author at Langenscheidt, Germany
Alumnus Associate of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, NYC

All materials presented on LawPundit.com are for information only.
No warranties are made regarding the truth or accuracy of postings.
Nothing on this website or blog is intended as legal advice nor is it legal advice.
Always consult your lawyer for legal advice in matters of private or business importance.

LawPundit expressly disclaims any liability for the consequences of links to third party websites.


Legal Notice of Fair Use of Copyrighted Materials
Copyrighted materials on LawPundit are posted under the "fair use" exception
as granted by Title 17 U.S.C [United States Code] Section 107.

This page is powered by Blogger.

This work is licensed under a... Creative Commons License......Creative Commons License


Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, Impressum (required by German law), Publisher

LawPundit syndicated feeds are intended for personal and professional non-commercial use.
Commercial transformative fair use in blog catalogs or search engines is permissible.
LawPundit can be quoted - in reasonable amounts - with attribution. That is fair use.
We reserve the right to require that anyone cease distributing LawPundit content at any time.







The Law Pundit - LawPundit Weblog - LawPundit Blog - LawPundit Blawg


Our Websites and Blogs
| Megaliths.net | LexiLine.com | AndisKaulins.com | LawPundit.com | LawPundit Blog |
| Aabecis | Aha! A Pharaoh | AK Photo Blog | Alpha Pundit | Ancient Egypt Weblog | Ancient World Blog | Andis Kaulins Blog
| Archaeology Travel Photos | Archaeology Websearch | Archaeo Pundit | Arts Pundit | Blogacus | Book Pundit | Civilization Pundit |
| Clipmarks | Computer Pundit | Dainas | deli.cio.us (akaulins) | DocStoc (AKaulins) | Earn a Ton | EU Pundit | edu.edu | Einstein's Voice |
| EU Legal | EU Pundit | getCITED | Golf Pundit | Google Pundit | Gourmet Pundit| Hand Proof | House Pundit | Idea Pundit |
| Isandis | Journal Pundit | Kaulins | Kaulinsium | Kaulinsium (MySpace) | Kaulinsium (WordPress) |
| Latvian Blog | Law Pundit II | Learn a Ton | LexiLine Archive | LexiLine Group | Lexiline Journal |
| Library Pundit | Life's Laws and Rules | Lingwhizt | LinkedIn | Literary Pundit | Magnifichess |
| Megalithic World | Megaliths | Megalithic Wiki at Wikia.com (a community site founded by the Law Pundit) |
Official Pundit | Orcim T. Fos | Photo Blog of the World | Plaxo | Prehistoric Art Pundit | PunditMania | Quick to Travel |
| Quill Pundit | Road Pundit| Scribd (Andis Kaulins) | Sport Pundit | Star Pundit | Stars Stones and Scholars (Website) |
| Stars Stones and Scholars (Book) | Stars Stones and Scholars (Blog) |
| Techinax | The Enchanted Glass | UbiquitousPundit | VoicePundit |
| WatchPundit | Word Pundit | Writely | YahooPundit |